Friday, November 30, 2007

All I Want For Christmas

We don't do Christmas presents.

You read me right. It started some years ago in my family of origin. I don't remember who said it first, me or my brother, but the comment went like this: "We're in our thirties, we have decent incomes that buy us what we want when we want it, no one in our family actually needs anything at Christmas, and we have no clue what each other wants in our family, nor can we tell each other what we might like for Christmas. So let's quit."

To pacify those who couldn't face Christmas without getting something "gifty," we proposed that the family drive over to the bookstore together, and each of us would buy ourselves a book. Then we'd each have something to new for Christmas.

And that is what we did.

When I married Husband six-ish years ago, he was still carrying on the family tradition of everyone having a gift from each other person in the family (count it up--that's five gifts for each of us, minimum), plus doing stockings for the kids, stuffed to the gills with an assortment of goodies. (I love that word "assortment." It reminds me of those round tins of British butter cookies.) Husband heard about my family tradition, and each year our Christmas has gotten simpler and simpler. Sort of the "step-it-down method" of change, I guess.

This year we'll have two of the kids home for Christmas, and Husband's thinking we'll make it a "no gifts" Christmas. However, on the agenda are still stockings filled with delights such as nuts, satsuma tangerines and gold dollars in the toes. Other than the stockings, our gifts will consist of the activities of sledding (yep, our 20-somethings including the son-in-law still like to go sledding up at Andes Prairie), cookie-making, juggling, generally schlepping around and sleeping in as long as we wish.

Mighty fine.

I, however, still plan on a new book for myself. It wouldn't be Christmas without one.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Drive to Dayton

[Click on the photos to see them in larger format]
Today I drove to Dayton, Washington for an appointment. It has snowed the last two mornings, and as you enter the Palouse hills there's a new picture-postcard scene to greet you around every corner. One of the first was this barn as I entered Dixie, a little burg that I'd miss if I didn't have to slow down to obey the speed limit.
The panoramas were quiet, almost magical with the hills disappearing up into the winter fog. Blues and greys and whites merge imperceptibly into each other. As a girl who grew up around palm trees and jungle creep, where the seasons were "rainy" or "dry," this still strikes me every year as being strange, as though I'd moved to a different universe. What is this kind of world where, under the snow, winter wheat will soon be appearing, where the farm machines sit out by the road with their new winter-white caps of snow, where simple farmhouses sit quiet and dark as though nobody were home? How can a world so cold and inhospitable also look so enchanting?

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Ode to the Hemidemisemiquaver

It's not as weird as you think. I was trained musically in the British system in which notes have different names than they do here in the United States. So here's how it goes, since understanding these little guys will be important if you're to get the object lesson.

The longest note in my book is a "breve," known in the U.S. as a "double whole note. It lasts for eight beats, which is more than you generally find in a measure of music. While I suppose there might be some note that would last a longer time, I wouldn't know what it is.

By the way, doesn't it strike you odd that "breve" sounds like it might be related to "brevity?" They are comparatively quite the opposite of each other.

Once you figure out the "breve," there's a note half as long, called the "semibreve," known around here as a "whole note." The length of these is bearable (i.e. four beats), but I sure wouldn't want to sit through a composition made solely of semibreves.

And so it goes. In a typical four-beat measure you can have one semibreve. Or two minims. Or four crotchets. Or you can get really adventuresome and fit in eight quavers (pictured on on the left) into a four-beat measure. Don't eight quavers sound rather jello-like?

But we're not done yet. A quaver has a little flag on it's stick, as you can see. From here on out we just keep on adding flags. So a semiquaver (sixteen in a measure) has two flags. And a demisemiquaver has three flags (thirty-two of those in a measure). And hemidemisemiquaver has four flags.

You can get sixty-four hemidemisemiquavers in a measure. Sixty-four. If you're at all musical, you recognize the nimbleness (Nimbility? Nimblosity? Hmmm. This gets fun!) required to fit sixty-four fast-moving little notes--or variations thereof--into a four-beat measure. That must be why the literature I read says they're rather rare. I believe I've heard an Andres Segovia recording on the guitar with his fingers moving that fast. Maybe. That would be approximately sixteen notes sounding out every second.

There is, by the way, a note faster than the hemidemisemiquaver, but its name is boring: the semihemidemisemiquaver. When you get two "semi's" in there, it loses it's charm, don't you think? Why not keep going with the fun and call it a "yemihemidemisemiquaver," or something similarly irresistible?

Another fascinating tidbit to point out is that for every note there's a rest. If it's a hemidemisemiquaver rest, it's the tiniest micromoment when sound ceases and there's a breath of quiet.

I got to thinking about the hemidemisemiquavers yesterday evening after I mentioned the word and my husband cracked up. (I put on my annoying "I'm an authority; quit laughing" attitude, and he sobered up enough to believe me.) Hemidemisemiquavers represent something deep to me, the more I think about them.

Tiny things--even when you can fit sixteen of them into a heartbeat--are extremely important. Tiny things bear noticing. I've seen this in little expressions that flit across someone's face [To follow interesting posts on the relationship between microexpressions, tiny disconnects in logic, and truth, I highly recommend the blog, "Eyes for Lies." Fascinating]. I've seen it in the tiniest pause when someone is expressing himself verbally. I've seen it in the smallest gift of kindness, if just a gentle pat on someone's shoulder in passing. That "hemidemisemiquaver" of a moment can mean the difference between understanding and misunderstanding, between human connection or isolation, between falsehood and truth, between life and death.

Long live the hemidemisemiquaver, rare though it may be! Long live those with the perceptiveness to notice those "hemidemisemiquaver" moments in life, and to make them count in making someone else's life a little better and truer.

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Q&A: Rocks in Psalms

"Come, let us sing for joy to the LORD; let us shout aloud to the Rock of our salvation. Ps. 95:1

I love having the resources of an academic community at my fingertips! When I wonder about something I'm studying, I can get expert answers so quickly. I invite you along on this Q&A with me....


The Question:

[Professor Old Testament], can you help me with a question I’m curious about this morning? I think I need someone who knows Hebrew. I was just having my worship and journaling on Psalms 95, and I was thinking about the phrase, “the Rock of our salvation.” (Ps. 95:1) I was curious why the psalmist chose the word “rock,” and what the significance was to the Israelites. My Bible notes referred me to Ps. 18:2 for more information, so I went to those notes, and they say that there are two different Hebrew words for “rock” used in 18:2. So I’m curious: what is the difference between the two “rocks,” and which one applies to 95:1?

I was trying to think of any English equivalents, and I am considering that we have the words: rock, stone, boulder. Maybe some others, but I can’t think of them.

Any light you can shed would be interesting to me.

Thanks!

Ginger


The Answer:

Dear Ginger,

Of course I am willing to send you a few observations. I will make a few remarks about "rock metaphors" in the Bible and then zero in on the examples from Psalms which you mentioned:

In addition to the literal meaning, rock (in Palestine it is "bedrock") can have figurative meanings in the Bible. As such, like any other metaphor in the Bible it can be either positive or negative (for example, the lion from the tribe of Judah, versus the roaring lion). As positive, rock or bedrock stands for safety, protection, hence it stands for God who protects when we are in danger. Palestine is a place full of rocks (and stones), while in Babylon there was only mud and sand (See the story in Genesis 11). Stone and rocks are the best building material in the Mediterranean culture.

As negative, rock stands for a danger or difficulty in life when we feel pressed, so to say, against the rock and pray to God our rock to come to our rescue and take us into a large place. Oppressive world powers are also described in the Bible as "destroying mountains and rocks." There are many passages in the Bible which use these fascinating metaphors.

According to the rules of the Hebrew grammar, Psalm 95:1 could also be translated as "our Rock of salvation." "Rock" in this case stands for God and his protection, while the noun "salvation" is built on the same root as the name "Jesus." This Psalm makes several references to the journey of the Israelites to the land of Canaan. It reminds of several stories related to the rocks in the wilderness. The psalm is suggesting that rock stands for God's constant care for his people. In the NT, Paul in 1 Corinthians will identify this Rock as Christ who led his people through the wilderness.

You are right when you say that two different Hebrew words are used in the two different passages: Psalm 95 uses the word TSUR (read as "tsoor"). This word was commonly used by Israel's neighbors in the northwest and the place name Tyre (a city on the Mediterranean coast) comes from this Semitic root. The same is true of the name TAURUS. Psalm 18:3, on the other hand, uses the word SELA' commonly used by the people who lived in the southeast. The famous place in Jordan known to us as Petra is called in Hebrew and Arabic "Sela'." You can see that this word is used in this verse in parallelism with the word fortress. Often times, while TSUR is used for natural rock, SELA' is used to describe rock which has some type of carved place in it. It is possible here to see the two words as synonyms because verse 32 on this psalm describes God also as TSUR.

Are there nuances, however, presented through the uses of the two words? I would say yes: While TSUR is more of a rough, natural, virgin type of rock, SELA' is more of a carved, worked, shaped type of rock. Thus, the former is primarily used to represent God, while the latter often stands for the place of safety to which God leads/takes his child out of danger.

I trust that these observations will be of help in your study.

Have a blessed Thanksgiving holiday!

Friday, November 16, 2007

Better Than Our Fears

Lions Park duck pondThis week one of our English professors did a presentation on her sabbatical, during which she studied the diaries of her great-great-grandmother, Grace Byington, the wife of a pastor and church leader in the 1800s. The presentation was a wonderful window into the way people lived their lives back then. But more than that, I was struck by the frequent ending to Grace's diary entries: "Our Lord is better than our fears."

That refrain has been sounding out over and over in my head since I heard it on Tuesday. Our Lord is better than our fears. It was clearly of much comfort to a hard-working, sometimes disappointed woman in Michigan who churned an awful lot of butter and tended the farm in order to help make ends meet. Did she think her life was a good one?

Our Lord is better than our fears.

I did a web search for the phrase, and came up with the following passage from a sermon by Charles Spurgeon. Could Grace have read his sermons? He lived during the same years and he, too, used the phrase. Here it is:

Ah, yes, we shall often have to say, "Oh Lord, I had not thought that you would do as much as this, but You have gone far beyond what I asked or even thought." I hope that this will be among our dying speeches and confessions, that the half was never told us, that our good Lord kept the best wine until last, and that the end of the feast on earth, being but the beginning of the feast eternal in heaven, was the crown of all. Let us declare concerning our Lord that we found him better and better and better and better, even until we entered into His rest. He has been at first better than our fears, then better than our hopes, and finally better than our desires. So good, so blessed a God do we serve, that he always by His deeds of grace outruns our largest expectations. What cause we have for worship and grateful praise; let us not be slow to render it. [emphasis mine]

As we enter into the week of Thanksgiving, let me chime in with Grace and at least start by saying this: "Our Lord is better than our fears."

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

MR DUCKS

Taken at Lions Park last Saturday afternoonLife is just nutty at the moment. Busy and a bit of crazy. Plus I've been in a mighty tussle with a bad cold for a week and a half. So I've not had much time to think, let alone write.

I did, however, take myself for a nice walk by Lions Park pond and Garrison Creek a few days ago when the lighting was glorious. Whenever I see the ducks at the pond, I think of the fun "Arkansas reading test" my cousin Keith gave me when I was growing up, and quote as much of it as I can remember to Husband, if he's along with me:
MR DUCKS
MR NOT
OSAR
CM WANGS
LIB
MR DUCKS!

Leaving that deep thought with you, I'm off into another long day.

Sunday, November 11, 2007

A Referral

Please go look at my blog-friend Joan's post today, here.

We all need to hear the message she heard.

Book Review: The Speed of Trust

The library at our university
In the autumn, if it's a good rainy day, you just might want to curl up with a good book and a hot drink within reach. While my moments for reading are grabbed on airplanes or in a few moments while eating breakfast (the couch and a nearby hot drink sound like heaven), I do manage to finish a book from time to time ... and to share it here, if it's good. Currently I'm finishing The Speed of Trust by Stephen M. R. Covey. I highly recommend it, especially if you have any type of leadership role.

The title refers to Covey's premise that if you build good solid trust with those which whom you interact, you can get things done a lot faster. You come to agreement faster because you're not slowed down by everyone being self-protective and either arguing or checking on the other person to make sure they're not being conned or taken advantage of. Makes sense.

Covey begins by setting out four principles of credibility: integrity, intent, capabilities and results. These are core, he says, to building credibility and are the basis on which trust-building behaviors are built. He goes on to describe thirteen behaviors he's identified as trust-building. In a chapter for each, these behaviors range from speaking honestly, to creating transparency, to delivering results, to listening first ... and nine more.

I found myself both affirmed and challenged in reading this book. There's a lot I do in my leadership style that creates trust, but there's also room for improvement. I saw some areas in which I could change a behavior or two and make a big difference. It's not that any of us have ill intent, but sometimes we miss opportunities to improve in our clarity and open the landscape wide up for others to trust in our leadership. For example, I picked up on one simple tip he gave--stating intent--and have watched it work surprising quickly to bring positive results in small but significant ways.

Just one other note: While Covey focuses primarily on trust in the workplace, he really makes an effort to also show how the principles and behaviors can improve family life. If you're not a leader anywhere else, I suspect that slogging through the organizational stuff will still be worthwhile for the concepts you can also use at home.

A very readable book. Get it. Read it.

Thursday, November 8, 2007

Discovering Historical Philadelphia

Independence Hall, PhiladelphiaHere's a little look into the historical side I saw while in Philadelphia.

First, I suppose an explanation is due as to why this was such a discovery for me: I have never liked American history. As a kid growing up in Malaysia it irked me to have to learn about dates and people halfway around the world and two centuries ago, made to sound like they were all as holy as Bible characters. I could never keep the people, eras, wars and places straight. The stories were dry and flat, from a country and time in which everything was unfamiliar, from the houses, to the fashions, to the interest in politics.I was much more intrigued by having to learn the full name of our king in Malaysia. Just in case you are interested, the name of our king at that time was "Yang di-Pertuan Agong Tunku Ismail Nasiruddin Shah-ibni Al-Marhum Sultan Zainal Abidin." Pretty cool, huh? Much more interesting than Thomas Jefferson or Benjamin Franklin. What I didn't understand was how wise and truly world-changing the ideas of Jefferson, Franklin and others were, compared to our rather nothing-ish Yang di-Pertuan in his fancy clothes.

Fast forward to 2007. I went out for a walk on Saturday morning, thinking I'd get to the river, which I could see from my hotel room window. Walking down Market Street with a feeling of well-being in the relative quiet of early morning in a big city, I was brought up short by the sudden end of modern skyscrapers. Lawn stretched out on both sides of the street, and up to the right was the little building pictured at the top of this post. It should have been overpowered by the tall buildings around it, but instead it was the kind of building that, the minute you see it, you can't see anything else.Independence Hall. And to the right front of it was the long, low structure housing the Liberty Bell.

I got to see it when we took a tour on Saturday afternoon. We were fortunate to have an energetic National Park Service tour guide who is in love with history, with the ideas that flowed from these men who shaped our country, and with the buildings in which he works. He started by taking us into the colonial courtroom on the right side of Independence Hall as you face it. Having been to Williamsburg some years ago, I thought to myself, "Just another colonial room."
Nope. He told of how the colonial court worked on the model of the British justice system. Then he pointed out that "cage" you see on the front right side of the picture above. That, he said, is the "dock." It's where the prisoner/defendant stands during the entire trial. In the system back then, he pointed out, the defendant was presumed guilty until it was proven otherwise--thus the bars around him.

Immediately my mind flew to the title of a book by C.S. Lewis, which I haven't yet read: God in the Dock. I'd always pictured a boat tied up at a pier when I heard that title. I suddenly realized that the book is about putting God on trial, presumed guilty until proven otherwise, with the rest of us sitting there in our mortal audacity, judging the Judge of the Universe. And now I have that one on my "to read" list.Next, we went across the hall to the assembly room, where George Washington was declared the commander of the Continental Army in 1775, where the Declaration of Independence was adopted in 1776, and where the Constitution was drafted in 1787. I kept wondering: And why did Philadelphia not become the capital of this new country back then?

Our guide pointed out the chair at the front and center of the room, the actual chair where George Washington sat presiding over the drafting of the constitution. On the back of the chair, up top at the middle, is a painting of a rising sun. The task of developing the constitution was rather contentious through the four months that they worked on it. Benjamin Franklin was concerned that it gave the federal government too much power. But at the end, he remarked that although he'd wondered often during those months whether the sun was rising or setting, "now at length I have the happiness to know that it is a rising and not a setting Sun."It used to be that the Liberty Bell was housed in the tower over Independence Hall, but it now is in a low, long building across the street. There's a fascinating display to walk through on your way to see the bell, showing how the bell has been a symbol for hope and freedom all around the world in different times. Why?

What I didn't know is that there is a Bible verse cast into the design of the bell, inscribed right around the top of it. It comes from Leviticus 25:10 and reads, "Proclaim liberty throughout all the Land unto all the inhabitants thereof." William Penn chose that verse to symbolize the right to worship according to conscience--a defining concept behind the founding of the state of Pennsylvania. In the mid-1800s the abolitionists started calling the bell the "liberty bell;" they took it on as a symbol of freedom from slavery. Since then the liberty bell with its inscription has been a symbol for women's right to vote, for the civil rights movement in the United States, and for people from around the world seeking freedom from oppression.And about that crack? Well, I found out that no one knows exactly why or when it cracked. It just did, and despite one attempt to repair the crack, the bell hasn't rung since 1846.

Sunday, November 4, 2007

Discovering Philadelphia

It's the city of brotherly love, they say. And people here are surprisingly friendly as I'm out walking the sidewalks on Market Street. Sure, some don't look at you, but others give you eye contact and smile. Or maybe they, too, are visiting from the West.
I think it might be best to tell you about this in two posts, one about the city in general, and one about the historical spots I've seen so far. Remember, I'm in meetings here for most of each day, so this is not a comprehensive tour by any means. But I've managed to get out and about a bit. The buildings above are seen from the 33rd floor of the building where we've been meeting. Somehow we lucked out and got our meeting room on that top floor for the first two days. Today I start a different set of meetings, somewhere downstairs from my 19th floor hotel room.Since this town is rather old by American standards (still an infant by European standards), there is a variety of styles in architecture here, from colonial to sort-of rococco to art deco to modern steel-and-glass. I'm always drawn to the art deco (above), which has elements of Egyptian and who knows what else. I think it's the most pleasing to the eye.Then there's this, which is St. John's Catholic church just a block from our hotel. Wow. The outside looks like a castle in Scotland or something; I'm not sure what style you'd call it (and thus ends my pretense at knowing architecture).The first evening we were here, one of the other administrators at our meetings suggested we pop over to Macy's department store, where he said there was an organ concert every evening. Huh? An organ concert at a department store?

Turns out it's one of the largest organs anywhere, originally built for the World's Fair in St. Louis in 1908 and transported a few years later to the Wanamaker building (i.e. Macy's) here in Philadelphia. What you see above is just about 1/5 of the organ, which just goes up and up and even has pipes in the roof. The pipes total 28,500. You can read the history of the organ here, if you're interested.
The current organist is Peter Richard Conte. Can you imagine playing a mini-concert at a console like this one every day? I wonder when he practices. We toured it, and even though I was an organ minor in college and am used to lots of keys and stops and pedals, this setup made me dizzy just to look at it. The organ has what I think of as an American "wah-wah" sound, more appropriate to the music of Franck and Elgar. I prefer the brighter, sharper sound of the French Casavant we have in our university church.
As we stood in the courtyard below the organ, listening to the music, I surveyed surroundings: marble arches, pink lighting against the white stone, grand spaces, spaces soaring high up...and Christmas Shreks around the newly decorated trees over the cosmetics counters. Piles of Christmas Shreks? Rather freaky, don't you think?On the way back to our hotel, I peered into the window of the transportation museum and saw this sign. It cracked me up because I spend so much of my days in committees, and I find that some people are skeptical of how much we get done in those venues (I tell people sassily, "We get a lot done--when I'm chairing"). In case you can't see it, this sign is over a trolley car, and the title reads, "A Success Designed and Built by Committee." See?! It's possible.
One of the cool things in Philadelphia is all the murals on the walls of buildings. They vary widely in style and they go from rich color, to pastels, to black-and-white. I could never show you all of them, but here are two. This second one is on the YMCA building. I'd suppose that each of the murals has something to do with the contents of the building, but I'm not sure how this one connects to the Y.Here's a photo of dessert at the Burmese restaurant on Friday evening. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, better than sticky rice and mangos in coconut milk sauce for dessert. I'm really enjoying all the ethnic food restaurants available this weekend. Time to catch up before heading back to the impoverished restaurant life in my own town.And finally, I could not figure out what this meant. It was a little sign embedded in the sidewalk on a corner across from City Hall. In a city of monuments and historic spots, why would you point out that a space isn't dedicated? Why would you take the trouble to make the sign, and pour a new piece of sidewalk around it? Beats me. But I think there's an object lesson in there somewhere.